![]() On June 25, gymnast Simone Biles was not having the Olympic Trials her fans had anticipated. She had stepped out of bounds, fallen off the beam, and not stuck a landing. She was still brilliant, of course. She is arguably one of the greatest athletes ever and she easily clinched the top spot on the U.S. Olympic team. But she was clearly not satisfied with her performance. After she finished her floor routine—eye-popping, as usual, but not perfect—the camera followed her to the sidelines. She sat down on the floor, reached into her backpack, and pulled out a long pair of shears to cut off the tape supporting her troublesome ankle. That task quickly dispatched, she reached into her backpack again and pulled out an almost comically large makeup brush. While the camera remained trained on her, she proceeded to powder her face. My jaw dropped. In the middle of an immensely significant athletic competition, one of the world’s greatest felt compelled to touch up her makeup. Perhaps the sheer ordinariness of that action calmed her. Perhaps it was a way to boost her confidence. But at a moment when she most needed to concentrate on her athletic performance, she was fixing her face. I was chagrined. Clearly I can’t ignore the fact that many, many female Olympians wear makeup and other cosmetic enhancements while competing. Eyelashes and fingernails of grotesque lengths are common. And how on earth do track athletes—male and female—run with necklaces and chains bouncing under their chins? I doubt these trends started in 1988 with Flo-Jo, but we all paid attention when she positioned herself in the starting blocks, her wickedly curved nails splayed on the track, her hair loose and flowing. This year, media reported as frequently on Sha’Carri Richardson’s flaming orange hair and outrageous fingernails as they did on her speed. Too bad we won’t get to see her perform in Tokyo. These fashionistas do succeed in grabbing our attention. But don’t they already do that with their athletic feats? Many, like the gymnasts, sometimes appear made up for a performance at the Grand Guignol. Why do they feel so compelled? As a youngster and a teenager I participated in nearly every sport available to girls at the time. I was notoriously average at all of them. But I loved being active, I loved the discipline it required, and I loved the harmony of a team effort. Being an athlete, no matter how ordinary, made me feel strong. It gave me confidence. But more than that, it allowed me to play a role other than “Sallie,” the socially awkward, too smart for her own good, outsider. Instead, I was the 4’11’’ hurdler or the feisty all-state midfielder or one of eight synchronized swimmers trying bravely to mimic the moves of the more experienced swimmers. I was gutsy, determined, fearless. As a teenage athlete, I could set aside, however momentarily, the fact that I wasn’t beautiful. I had no idea how to apply makeup to improve my appearance. With those two marks against me, finding acceptance at that age was difficult. But I could disappear on the tennis court or the hockey field. My sweat was worth something. My tenacity had value. So it makes me sad to see that, in 2021, many of our greatest athletes still view their looks as part of their performance. They have to be strikingly beautiful, perfectly coiffed, overly made up. Somehow they must feel that their athletic skills alone cannot validate their presence on the world stage. Years of training can only get them so far. Perhaps it’s the lure of lucrative promotional contracts that prompts them to make sure their appearance is as perfect as their performance. I wish young girls could see these athletes as the pure, powerful women they are. They don’t need fake eyelashes and fake fingernails and fake hair color to make a statement. They just need to demonstrate their prowess as heart-stopping, mind-blowing athletes. As the 2021 Olympics approached, several female athletes and their teams made the news for their attire. An official from England Athletics claimed that Welsh Paralympic world champion Olivia Breen’s sprint shorts—the Adidas official 2021 briefs—were too short. The European Handball Association's Disciplinary Commission fined the female Norwegian beach handball team when they showed up for a match in compression shorts similar to what the men wear rather than the mandated bikini bottoms. Black Olympic swimmers were denied the option of wearing the Soul Cap, a swim cap designed to better accommodate and protect their hair. Why can’t we just let women compete? Why does their appearance have to play such a large role? This morning I watched a men’s sand volleyball match, the men dressed comfortably in shorts and tank tops. I don’t have to tell you what the women are expected to wear.
6 Comments
Robert Mcwilliams
7/25/2021 11:02:33 pm
It seems the athletes are trying to establish their brand with the hair, nails, makeup and jewelry. Self promotion I guess.
Reply
Catherine Bishop
7/26/2021 08:32:07 am
Good thoughts, Sallie! It's true that progress in some areas seems to be made very slowly, but don't forget all the years when women were not allowed to compete in many events, and the Paralympics didn't even exist. I have a book on women's running that was written about 40 years ago when very few women entered 5K races; now, many races have more female entrants than men. We all need to examine "the way it's always been done" in so many areas of sports, society, and gender identification. Some of these changes will be easier than others, but we need to be open to different views of what is the fairest way to do things now and in the future.
Reply
Sallie Showalter
7/26/2021 09:54:10 am
You are so right, Catherine, that immense progress has been made over decades. But I am impatient! And it's hard when the inequity is so "in your face." I will look harder for the incremental change that may be more lasting.
Reply
Joseph Anthony
7/26/2021 12:37:14 pm
In the early seventies, male fashion for young men (straight and gay) were high heels and pants so tight you couldn't have a back pocket. You wobbled when you walked and if you wanted to carry a wallet you needed a man purse. I never went for the pants but I wore the high heels one work day---a work day where I ran around quite a bit and ended up near crippled. The only other shoe choice was what Grandpop wore. Move over, Grandpop, I said after that day.
Reply
Vince Fallis
7/26/2021 02:30:13 pm
Perhaps progress is denied in the aspect of the athlete devoted to his /her sport for the "love of the game". On the other hand opportunity has exploded for the athlete who has blended their greatness with self promotion and relentless development of the brand. This has now become available regardless of gender or sexual orientation. Just imagine how some of those now reaping the bounty of athleticism and brand would have fared in the 50's and 60's. So good for them despite the fact that they have had to fastidiously attend to the image along with the ability. It's only just started with the NCAA ruling on athletes becoming CEO's of their identity, image and brand. The true love of the game crowd will still be doing what they do now. playing in Rec leagues, Church leagues on the sand lots and playgrounds and in whatever gym is available.
Reply
Sallie Showalter
7/29/2021 05:35:26 pm
I grew up in the era when all Olympic athletes were amateurs who did not (yet) have to expend so much energy wooing sponsors and promoting a "brand." They simply had to be the best in the world at their sport. I suppose that is what I miss. Yet another example of how I have grown too old for this world.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Details
Archives
June 2023
Categories
All
|